Blind Gene Finds An Acorn

Carol Folt worries
BobLee
November29/ 2015

If a stopped watch is right twice a day…. and a blind hog CAN find the occasional acorn…. then

UNC’s Gene “The Gasbag” Nichol can be right ….. maybe once in a dozen blue moons.

Mark this…. Gene is Right on his latest N&O Rant about UNCCH’s SuperSecret Cover Our Ass $$$ Stash for Spinning The Great  Unpleasantness.

UNC’s ongoing flim flam about “all these bazillions of COA $$$$ are not really coming from operating funds…. they are all coming from “somewhere else but don’t ask where because…. well, just don’t ask”.   Gene asks.

To be more precise, Gene confirms what everyone always knew…. all the bazillions of COA $$$ ARE coming from funds originally intended for quasi-legitimate purposes.    I say quasi-legitimate because NOTHING that happens in Big Academia is truly legitimate any more.Carol Folt worries

I do love Gene’s WHAMMO that:

UNC Admins are SUPPOSED to be competent enough to deal with “issues” without contracting out “the yucky ones” to high-priced legal mouthpieces and equally high-priced PR slicks.   Pretty much EVERYONE has been thinking THAT too.

Sure…. we all knew Chihuahua was hired because (1) she sits down to pee…. and (2) she came from The Ivy League.  Maybe (3) No one else wanted to inherit The Mess.   Being a walking billboard for socio-cultural-political traumas de’jour – a/k/a her infamous lapel ribbon collection…. is the extent of Madame Folt’s meager leadership skill set.  Provost Dean makes a bull-in-a-china shop look like a ballerina …. and the entire “tits on a bull” BOT has gone AWOL apparently hiding in the labyrinthian catacombs of The Rat.   “They” hired a $400,000 Vice Chanc of Spin & Obfuscation to go out and hire a million dollar crony PR firm.

Any hoo…. read Gene’s raging rant below.   Normally I provide a link to the actual source but this is in Sunday’s News & Observer and it’ll be a VERY cold day in Hell before I send those no-count SOBs any clicks.

###

 

At UNC, abdicating the obligations of leadership in scandal

By Gene Nichol Gene Nichol

November 29, 2015
When we spend millions on the nation’s most expensive lawyers and corporate consultants, we deploy funds that could have supported impoverished Carolina Covenant students, or increased skimpy graduate student stipends, or raised the salaries of maintenance workers

So enough with the “it’s only private money” charade

 

Like many, I was distressed, though not surprised, that UNC-CH has spent north of $10 million on public relations consultants and lawyers to deal with our academic and athletic scandals. I suppose this is what the aspiration to “run the university like a business” looks like.

Over $5 million went to Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. The folks at Skadden, Arps got a couple million more. We paid $1.3 million to Bond, Schoeneck & King; another million to Baker, Tilly. Almost double that amount went to Edelman, a giant PR outfit, offering expertise on “corporate reputation management.” FleishmanHillard raked in almost $400,000. You’d think the Old Well had relocated to Madison Avenue.

High-dollar outside investigators were reportedly necessary because, after years of stonewalling and false assurance, no one would believe an analysis conducted by the administration. A campus public relations officer explained, enthusiastically, that the millions to Edelman were spent to “support our management of media relations, content creation and internal communication.” FleishmanHillard’s website boasts it is “the most complete communications agency in the world, capable of reaching any audience, with any message, through any channel.” Praise the Lord. The new Carolina Way revealed.

There are, I suppose, millions of things that could be said of this. I limit myself to two.

First, at the end of every story about UNC’s breathtaking expenditures, the same concluding assurance appears.

“Officials say that none of these legal and public relations bills are paid for by tuition or state appropriations.” The money comes from the private UNC Foundation. Not to worry.

This is, at best, only half the story. Much money given to the university is designated for a specific purpose – to create scholarships for needy students, to build new classroom facilities, to support professorships in the arts, and the like.

The dollars used to pay PR flacks and branding specialists, on the other hand, must come from undesignated gifts. Surely no donor has established a fund to help the chancellor decide and articulate what the university stands for. I’m guessing it never before would have been thought necessary.

When we spend $10 million or $15 million on the nation’s most expensive lawyers and corporate consultants, we deploy funds that could have supported impoverished Carolina Covenant students, or increased skimpy graduate student stipends, or raised the salaries of maintenance workers. I’ve never heard the university admit this. So enough with the “it’s only private money” charade.

Second, when did we decide to routinely outsource the obligations of leadership?

Chapel Hill has a very robust legion of well-provided for administrators. We have a chancellor and a provost. Each has a bountiful array of associates. They are supported by a hefty public relations team and a first-rate group of lawyers.

Still, these days, whenever we face a significant challenge, we assume the need to hire a bevy of the nation’s highest-paid consultants to teach us how to behave like a decent institution. Having abdicated the obligations of leadership, we seem to think wisdom, character and savvy can be purchased. It’s not working.

Our greatest chancellor, William B. Aycock, died a few months ago. Dealing with crises like the Dixie Classic and the Speaker Ban, Aycock saw his share of trouble. Still, he never considered hiring “the most complete communications agency in the world.”

Thinking of Aycock, it’s easy to envision two distinct approaches to leadership and problem solving. In the first, decision-makers sit around a huge table in South Building. There is a chancellor and her cadre of assistants. And then a provost and his sizable group. Add to that our internal public relations team. And our external PR posse. Then there are internal and external groups of lawyers. As I said, it’s a big table.

They work for days, or weeks, responding to a crisis. Eventually a decision is made, and the group produces a statement to be issued by the chancellor.

The final product is so chockablock with doublespeak that faculty members jokingly circulate email translations for the bureaucratically unschooled.

In the other model, Aycock returns to his campus office late in the evening after having had dinner with his family. He has consulted with university officials throughout the day. Now he sits behind his desk, a small lamp providing illumination. He makes the toughest decisions. And with pen and yellow legal pad, he explains them to the university community and to the people of North Carolina.

The first model, of course, costs millions. The second, a relative pittance. But the cheap route would outperform the big boys every time.

Gene Nichol is Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor at UNC-Chapel Hill.
Op-Ed

 

Your first visit to BobLeeSays.com ??? Check out the Home Page for more stuff like this one. – LINK.

 

###

Tags:
BobLee

6
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
BobLeeSWVA UNCerGeek49203Dick Gray Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
SWVA UNCer
Guest
SWVA UNCer

Did little Carol forget to take her migraine meds that day?

Geek49203
Guest
Geek49203

So let me get this correct — the good lawyer is complaining about legal fees paid to another lawyer? Isn’t there some sort of professional “code of the road” on that one? That’s right up there with teachers who don’t like to be evaluated (God forbid! if they have to take a test), or doctors who don’t provide health care insurance to their employees when they refuse to treat those who don’t have it? Not that I disagree with a word Gene has said. Granted, I don’t know anything about Aycock, but at least, yeah, it would’ve been at least… Read more »

Dick Gray
Guest
Dick Gray

An acorn was found but no need to insult hogs.