“Racy Book” creates latest Hubbub @ Duke

August26/ 2015

Oh Goody!  It’s August so there must be another of those “University loonies force dirty anti-American filth on defenseless freshmen” articles. …. I’m not sure if UNC-CH was the first to “do this” but certainly we all recall back in the Meezie Regime,

a pretty stormy brouhaha over Meezie’s loonies forcing a book re: The Koran on incoming UNC freshmen.  

That one reinforced all the pre-existing stereotypes about “those people over there”.   No clue if anyone has tracked the plight of those freshmen since then.  Did any of’em go blind or grow hair in their palms?

I will never side with academ-loonies on anything simply out of general principle.   They are nutz…. which is why they are exiled to places like Chapel Hill (and Duke) where they can be “observed” and be subjects of endless demeaning comments like these.

…. But, just to be “fair” this book about “being gay” (yawn, another “gay book”) is NOT required reading…. just on a list of “suggested reading”.

“Going to college” at notorious bastions of self-righteous indignation such as Duke or UNCCH is not for the easily-offended.   Four years at “those places” will only feed pre-existing conditions.



LGBT memoir on Duke University reading list protested as insensitive to ‘Christian moral beliefs’

 August 25

It’s a tradition at some of the nation’s best universities: Incoming students are invited to read the same book, then talk about it. But before they even set foot on Duke University’s lush North Carolina campus, some members of the school’s incoming class of 2019 had a beef with a summer book they were offered.

It was racy, they said. It made them uncomfortable, they said. And they said it was anti-religion.

“I feel as if I would have to compromise my personal Christian moral beliefs to read it,” Grasso wrote in the post, as the Duke Duke BookChronicle reported.

The book in question: Alison Bechdel’s “Fun Home,” a memoir of the 54-year-old MacArthur ‘genius’s’ youth, during which she realized that she was gay and her father, who likely killed himself, was too.

[How Alison Bechdel changed the way we talk about film]

Released in 2006, the graphic novel, a New York Times bestseller that spawned a Tony Award winning Broadway musical, was showered with high praise.

“A comic book for lovers of words!” the New York Times wrote in 2006. “Bechdel’s rich language and precise images combine to create a lush piece of work — a memoir where concision and detail are melded for maximum, obsessive density. She has obviously spent years getting this memoir right, and it shows.”

The book’s stellar reputation is perhaps what led it to be taken up by Duke’s “Common Experience” selection committee, which chose “Fun Home” over tamer fare such as Nicholas Carr’s “The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to our Brains.”

“’Fun Home’ is a book like no other,” Ibanca Anand, a student member of the Duke Common Experience selection committee, said at the time the book was chosen. “The author uses the unique graphic medium to tell a story that sheds a lot of light on important and weighted issues like mental health, interpersonal relationships and human rights, all critical issues that students will become acquainted with in college.”

Some weren’t impressed.

“I thought to myself, ‘What kind of school am I going to?’” freshman Elizabeth Snyder-Mounts told the Chronicle.

The rejection of “Fun Home” by some in Durham, N.C., comes amid an ongoing debate about trigger warnings on college campus. Trigger warnings, often championed by groups perceived as liberal, caution students that material may be considered offensive or traumatizing for those who have experienced, for example, racism or sexual abuse. Some have said that trigger warnings be attached to texts previously thought uncontroversial such as Greek mythology and “The Great Gatsby.”

“It seems that mostly conservative sites and writers are concerned with the increasingly draconian suppression of free speech on college campuses,” Kathleen Parker, a conservative columnist for The Washington Post, wrote earlier this year. “But then, it is mostly conservative writers and speakers who are treated as though they’re bringing the Ebola virus rather than contrarian ideas to the sensitive ears of what we may as well name the ‘Swaddled Generation.’”

[Columbia students claim Greek mythology needs a trigger warning]

Yet at Duke, it was conservative Christian readers who refused to take up an allegedly offensive text — one written not by an author on the margins, but one praised even by the Wall Street Journal. No, the reading wasn’t required — it wasn’t even part of a course. But could readers simply dismiss Bechdel’s work not because they had read it and disliked it, but because they deemed the work too offensive to consider in the first place?

Some seemed to think so.

“Duke did not seem to have people like me in mind,” Grasso said, as the Chronicle noted. “It was like Duke didn’t know we existed, which surprises me.”

The selection committee, it should be noted, was aware that “Fun Home” might make waves.

“Because of its treatment of sexual identity, the book is likely to be controversial among students, parents and alumni,” selection committee member Simon Partner, a professor of history and director of the Asian/Pacific Studies Institute at Duke, said when the book was chosen. “I think this, in turn, will stimulate interesting and useful discussion about what it means, as a young adult, to take a position on a controversial topic.”

Moreover, the selection of “Fun Home” as reading for incoming freshman has been criticized before — in 2013, at the College of Charleston in South Carolina.

“I found it very close to pornography,” Oran Smith, the president and chief operating officer of Palmetto Family, a South Carolina religious group, said at the time. “… Way over the top.”

The book was also criticized after it was used in a course at Crafton Hills College in California in earlier this year.

“It was shocking,” student Tara Shultz said. “I didn’t expect to open the book and see that graphic material within. I expected ‘Batman and Robin,’ not pornography.” She added: “At least get a warning on the books.”

Some criticism of “Fun Home” in schools and elsewhere has focused on the fact that it is not a novel, but a graphic novel.

“The nature of ‘Fun Home’ means that content that I might have consented to read in print now violates my conscience due to its pornographic nature,” Duke freshman Jeffrey Wubbenhorst told the Chronicle.

Though not immediately available to comment on this story, Bechdel has defended her book against similar detractors in the past.

“Fun Home” “takes family secrets and drags them into the light of day,” Bechdel said two years ago as the Charleston controversy unfolded. “… Most families have secrets of one kind or another, and I think we start to become curious about them when we reach young adulthood and are trying to figure ourselves out in relation to our parents.”

Justin Wm. Moyer is a reporter for The Washington Post’s Morning Mix. Follow him on Twitter: @justinwmmoyer.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Tags: ,
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x