Bonnie & Clyde Answer: “Earth To Art…”

Bonnie and Clyde
BobLee
July25/ 2015

It didn’t take too long for “Bonnie & Clyde” to answer Art Chansky’s “Sylvia Must Go” commentaries.   This is not the first time that Bonnie & Clyde and Bre’r Chansky have aired their very different POVs on UNC-CH’s inglorious institutional dumpster fire now raging into its fifth year.

“Bonnie” a/k/a whistleblower Mary Willingham and “Clyde” a/k/a faculty dissident Jay Smith took to their website paperSylvia Hatchell UNCclassinc.com Thursday afternoon to refute Art’s assertion that:

It’s basically all Sylvia Hatchell’s fault.  If she will just go away, everything would be fine….

I went inside the Old Well Bubble Thursday midday to get a feel for how this latest chapter of The Great Unpleasantness TGU was playing out.   Even supporters of Sylvia were astounded to learn that UNC WoBB loses over $2,000,000/year…. as Art reported.  Stay tuned for the Next Salvo….

Paperclassinc.com

Earth to Art Chansky: It wasn’t about the women

In a recent commentary on WCHL, ardent UNC sports fan Art Chansky revealed his strategy for combating the NCAA’s Notice of Allegations [NOA] against the university’s athletic program: Blame it on the women! Complaining of women’s basketball coach Sylvia Hatchell’s (alleged) behind-the-scenes efforts to lobby for a contract extension comparable to the one recently offered men’s coach Roy Williams, Chansky griped that “an exit strategy should be [Hatchell’s’] play.” After all, Chansky claimed, “Hatchell’s program is in the most serious trouble from the NCAA’s Notice of Allegations,” given the high profile of women’s academic counselor Jan Boxill in the email documentation provided in the NCAA report. The whole NCAA investigation is a “witch hunt” with many victims, Chansky suggested, but the uncomfortable reality for women’s basketball is that “[Roy] Williams’ program was not cited in the NOA and Hatchell’s was.” Hatchell should therefore prepare herself to leave UNC “with grace.”

The propaganda purposes of this particular commentary are obvious even by Chansky’s standards. No team is “cited” in the NOA if by cited one means singled out for likely punishment. As a team and as a program, women’s basketball is cited in the NCAA document no more and no less than any other team or program. (The NCAA’s NOA did note, however, that the “special arrangements” used for eligibility purposes at UNC had particularly benefited “the sports of football, men’s basketball, and women’s basketball.”) Chansky, in other words, is only continuing and amplifying the PR drumbeat that Roy Williams, Larry Fedora and others began some weeks ago, presumably at the urging of university lawyers. They have repeatedly announced that the big-time men’s revenue sports would seem to be in the clear and should expect no further punishment from the NCAA. They would have us believe that the NCAA is prepared to give football and men’s basketball a free pass even after the exposure of decades’ worth of fraud that clearly benefited the football and men’s basketball teams. And they are evidently all too happy to point the finger of blame in the direction of a women’s team in order to lower expectations about the sanctions likely to be imposed on the men’s teams.

Leaving aside the gender politics of this shameless PR strategy–will advocates for women’s sports stand by while….

 …. male coaches, boosters, and UNC insiders labor to persuade the NCAA that the Crowder-Nyang’oro scheme was merely a big plot to help women?–Chansky and company face one very high hurdle in pursuit of their propaganda campaign. A mountain of direct and circumstantial evidence makes clear that UNC’s distinctive pattern of academic fraud was developed specifically to meet the needs of the men’s basketball team, and that the corruption reached its highest levels on Roy Williams’s watch.

The first suspect independent study courses offered by Julius Nyang’oro in the late 1980s were offered to men’s basketball players, some of whom had abysmal SAT scores and perilously low GPA’s before they met professor Nyang’oro. Faculty friends in geography, French, and the school of education had been very helpful to the team throughout the 1980s. But when leadership of the AFRI/AFAM department fell into the laps of two allies of men’s basketball around 1990–Nyang’oro and his assistant Debby Crowder, whose close friend Burgess McSwain served as academic counselor for the men in her remote Smith center office–that department quickly became the go-to academic center for struggling (or academically uninterested) men’s basketball players.

The fraud would morph into a multi-team and three thousand-student debacle before all was said and done, but men’s basketball was always first in line for favors and fake classes. The needs of men’s basketball always came first in the eyes of Debby Crowder. And the 2005 men’s team, whose roster was stocked with players for whom both McSwain and Crowder felt great sympathy, benefited from unprecedented levels of favoritism. The team as a whole took well over one hundred paper classes; as one would expect, the starters on that team benefited disproportionately from the scam.

Star forward Rashad McCants has had the guts to admit this publicly and to show the evidence of the fraud in his own student transcript. His teammates, though quick to denounce him, have kept their transcripts hidden. It is unlikely that anyone else from that team–Sean May, Raymond Felton, Jawad Williams, Marvin Williams, Reyshawn Terry, Jesse Holley, etc.–will ever step forward with transcripts in hand to have a frank conversation about their classroom experiences. But the truth is in those transcripts.

Chansky, Williams, and the friends of men’s basketball would have the world believe that twenty years of bogus class scheduling was done without the knowledge of anyone actually connected to the men’s basketball program. Coaches (who are paid millions to know everything) supposedly knew nothing. The only academic counselor who was knowingly, inexcusably corrupt, they say, was philosophy instructor Jan Boxill, counselor for the women’s basketball team. This “powerful” figure, they say, corrupted women’s basketball of her own volition. Thankfully, all other counselors were innocent–even if it is unfortunate that they failed to detect the shenanigans of Crowder and Boxill.

The layers of absurdity in this line of argument become hard to distinguish. One might start, however, with the simple fact that Jan Boxill, whatever her flaws, was far more vulnerable than powerful. She was an untenured instructor whose employment at UNC was always partially contingent on her services to the athletic program. She was a highly valuable cog in the machine because of her go-between status and her ability to negotiate academic protocols for counselors who were physically segregated from the main arteries of the campus. But her great value also increased her vulnerability. She was pressured constantly by other personnel in the Academic Support Program to call in favors, to make phone calls, to ask for benefits that were “needed” by athletes with low GPA’s, travel commitments, or other handicaps.

Among the people who leaned heavily on Jan Boxill were the counselors for men’s basketball–first McSwain and then Wayne Walden, Roy Williams’s handpicked deputy who followed him to Chapel Hill from Kansas in 2003. When Roy Williams touts Walden’s ethics, he is not just blowing smoke. Walden was a decent guy who worked within a system that had been built long before he arrived. (Where is he now? Why won’t he and the other counselors step forward to tell their stories?) Walden had a conscience, and he was not happy to have to resort to “paper classes” and wink-wink independent studies courses to help keep certain players afloat. But he also knew what had to be done when push came to shove.

Mary Willingham and Wayne Walden spent countless hours together in the old east end zone building talking about how difficult it was to keep challenged players eligible, and how much harder it was to navigate the UNC curriculum in comparison to the Kansas curriculum. (Thank the heavens for Debby Crowder and the few friendly faculty out there…) The course selection process they managed was never about offering players a world-class education; Willingham and Walden worked together–quite often with Boxill’s help, even more often with Crowder’s help–to keep basketball players eligible and in school. They were quite good at it, though Walden was constantly worried about getting Jan or Debby in trouble by asking for favors that would raise red flags. (One reason Boxill had so many emails to be plundered by Kenneth Wainstein and the NCAA: she worked in an office in Caldwell Hall, distant from the ASPSA. Deals, trouble-shooting, and schedule-engineering that were done face-to-face in the ASPSA had to be done through email whenever Boxill was involved. Conveniently for certain other key players in the drama, Boxill’s email was on the main UNC server rather than on the athletic server; her emails could not be expunged.)

Roy Williams has tried to take credit for steering players away from AFAM in 2006-7 (even as he disavows any knowledge of funny business in that department.) But the fact is, the transcripts of the 2009 national championship men’s team look different–with some but far fewer paper classes–only because a new fear of getting caught had set in around 2006. Remember the Auburn scandal and the panic it seems to have caused among ASPSA officials, the Faculty Athletics Committee, and Dean Bobbi Owen (who decreed that the numbers of AFAM independent studies had to be sharply reduced)? The upshot of the Auburn scandal, in the UNC men’s basketball program, was a new caution about cheating. The large-scale, team-wide stuff had to end.

Paper classes, Walden decided, should be used only for the athletes who desperately needed them – such as the one guy who “couldn’t read very well.” That particular player, whose needs forged a particularly close relationship between Walden and Willingham (a reading specialist), took between ten and twelve paper classes. That figure–compiled in the years after Roy Williams claims that he cleaned up the basketball program–is significantly higher than the number of paper classes ever taken by ANY women’s basketball player. The number of AFAM majors on the men’s basketball team may have dropped off after 2005, but the need for paper classes remained (for both current and former players), and men’s basketball stayed at the front of the line at least through 2008.

Art Chansky and company are desperately trying to persuade the NCAA and the public at large that UNC’s course fraud scam was all about helping the women’s basketball team. Chansky urges Sylvia Hatchell to play sacrificial lamb for a UNC athletic department that benefited broadly and egregiously from academic fraud that unfolded over twenty years. The NCAA has all the emails, with all the unredacted names, and so one can assume that the Committee on Infractions will be able to hold up against the propaganda winds. But regardless of what the NCAA does or does not do, people of good conscience in and around UNC must not allow the dreams of Chansky, Williams, and Fedora to come true. Collective amnesia is not an option in Chapel Hill. Owning the reality of the scandal is important because only after accepting the true dynamic of the academic-athletic scandal–only after Tar Heels have come to terms with the fact that our love of men’s basketball and our passionate commitment to winning fostered an uncontrollably corrupt academic environment here–will the institution be able to move on with open eyes, a clean conscience, and a healthy plan for the future.

Chansky asks Hatchell to leave with “grace.” But grace has never been about willful blindness, nor should it be about taking one for the team. “Was blind but now I see,” goes the beloved lyric. Those touched by grace are not asked to go into exile; they are reconciled to a higher power and beckoned to a welcoming place (“grace will lead me home.”). Asking Sylvia Hatchell to go away is not the answer to UNC’s disgrace. The institution should instead be asking for its own gift of grace—the gift of clear-sighted reconciliation with the sins of its past.

  ###

Back To More Quirky News !!

BobLee

34
Leave a Reply

avatar
17 Comment threads
17 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
15 Comment authors
BobLeeCabcashZookeeperbobPuddentain Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Cabcash
Guest
Cabcash
Guest
Cabcash

“He funneled money to multiple Tar Heels players…”

“But roughly 75 pages of unsealed documents include other examples…”

 

Be interesting to see if Art can hang this one on the ladies too. Hey , not fer nuthin’ but Constance Orr WAS a softball player. Football reappears into the mix…

 

link

Zookeeper
Guest
Zookeeper

Art appears to be another bitter old man and alumnus unable to face the harsh truth behind TCW.  He might want to change his depends more frequently or is there something else still stinking up Chapel Hill. IC board monkeys are slinging poo again … gotta go hose them down and clean ’em up before Fedorian football starts up or Obama comes to town to crown Folt Miss Midget America.

bob
Guest
bob

Seems like those that hold Dean in the highest regard forget his RALF method of dealing with mistakes. Tell Art that step 2 is admitting the mistake.

Puddentain
Guest
Puddentain

BL, I’ve been off searching for Xanadu, often just out of range of a good wi-fi signal.

 

I’m posting today mainly to try out my new avatar. As far as I know, his worst crime is playing jazz.

Vegas player
Guest
Vegas player

I wonder how that documentary that’s supposed to set the record straight is coming.  I had seen someone make a suggestion when it was announced that they not go out and just do a bunch of silly interviews,  but from what I’ve read that’s really all they are doing. As I’ve stayed before, if I thought I could get an honest answer out of anyone over at UNC I could gain lots of knowledge and put an end to this for UNC once and for all. I have proposed that this is what set Mr. Kane off on his dismantling… Read more »

Puddentain
Guest
Puddentain

When I look at pictures of Art, he reminds me of my uncle Charlie (from up Burke/Caldwell way). In fact if it weren’t for the fact that Art has no ethics, no common sense, the intelligence of an eggplant, they could be twins! In fact, my uncle who sadly passed away a number of years ago, is still a better man dead than Art has ever hoped to be.   Thank you Bob Lee for shining a light.   As for my avatar, alas, one of my childhood heroes appears to have clay feet. I’ll have to find a new avatar.… Read more »

Doug
Guest
Doug

“SrAdmins and BOT are not humans of exceptional integrity or very high character. They’re a pretty scummy bunch of weasels.” You’re probably being overly generous. Being an internet legend has its burdens I’m sure. 

wolfdon
Guest
wolfdon

Mary and Jay have a way of cutting through all the BS and telling it exactly like it is……after all they have been there in the middle for quite a long time with access to the transcripts..

Doug
Guest
Doug

Like Jay & Mary’s take a lot and agree with 95% of the piece but when the NCAA cited impermissible benefits this telegraphed, at least to me, a disinterest in any academic fraud. So while Art’s arugument has been effectively countered, I still believe Art’s conclusion will be closer to the final outcome. So while 95% of what Art said is pure poppycock, the 5% he’s right on will likely rule the day imo. Sad ain’t it? I don’t want to be right and hope I’m completely wrong and agree in advance to a public flogging if I am.

Bill
Guest
Bill

Please; I’ll admit to being “blue of center” but I like to think I’m not in denial of the facts as reported in the Wainstein report.  But this “response” reads like an N&O article about anything GOP.  The agenda is clear and they twist a lot of their assertions as if they were facts; at least Art is a little more obviously stating his opinion rather than reporting facts.

And, the idea that the NCAA would be influenced by any internet blow-hards is ludicrous.

Taking a step back, though, are these internet kitten fights analogous to rapper feuds?

NCSU68Grad
Guest
NCSU68Grad

couple of interest columns that you have clicked in the past few days.  I wondered if I left the locale for a few weeks if things would continue to get a little “funky”?  Yep.  Does not surprise me.  Have traveled about 1850 miles in the motor home and am in Denver. One observation….are you a fan of “Under the Dome”?.  If so, it’s Bizarre Index has been turned up a notch this year.  Your comment about the UNC Bubble prompted me to wonder is the writers are really that creative?  Seems like the folks “Under the Bubble” in CH are… Read more »

Frank Linstreet
Guest
Frank Linstreet

“If I had a nickel” for every time over the past 2-3 years I’ve said “It can’t possibly get any more BIZARRE than this?” …. and now we have a new definition of THIS.

90Lobo
Guest
90Lobo

They would have us believe that one black man and a handful of women caused all of this. No white dudes.

Got it.

John
Guest
John

Chansky actually wrote this a while back:

 

if UNC gets severely nailed on any of this, whoever was responsible for commissioning the Wainstein Report, long after the problems were found and fixed, needs to pack up and leave town

somehow having missed that Barbara Boxill was sitting chair of the Faculty Council, Tim McMillan was on the AFAM faculty, Jamie Lee was employed by ASPSA, Beth Bridger was employed within the UNC system, etc. when the report was released (hint, reports are released after they’re commissioned… in this case long after).

 

Chansky’s become unhinged.

58wolf kennel
Guest
58wolf kennel

Truly powerful!! Is this part of a follow-on book. Will be most interesting to see the Butch football overload tie-in. We could get a great TV series developed out of this. “House of Shards”.

Yogi
Guest
Yogi

BOOM!  Take that Art!  That is without a doubt one of the best pieces I’ve seen on TGU.